It’s an age old problem. Managers intuitively know that
providing staff with specialized training makes them more proficient, helps
increase confidence and improves the bottom line. So, you might ask, what is
the problem? The answer is simply they can’t prove it. And, proof is what’s
needed in order to justify the time and cost of providing training.
The challenge of creating a ROI for training is that it
needs something to be compared to and without the ability to know what the
training investment is being compared to, calculating the ROI is next to
impossible. The root of the issue is the establishment of benchmarks. Here is
where many exhibit managers fall down in their ability to collect meaningful
data from their exhibit experiences and to use that data to establish a
benchmark from which future performance is compared.
Here is an example of a few of the bits of data that should
be included in a post-show statistical analysis:
Sales cycle
This calculation of the average time it takes once your
sales folks have met someone to the time it takes that contact to make a
decision. This is an important number because once it is defined, it helps your
booth staff focus on the right people.
Average time to
convert a visitor to a lead
This is important because it helps your booth staff
determine the length of a booth presentation and helps them manage their time.
Audience profile
You need to have a breakdown of the audience at any event to
determine if there is a match between who is attending and the profile of your
target contact (that is the person most likely to turn into a high quality
lead) that you should have
created ahead of time.
Success ratio
Success ratio answers the question “If you gave one of your
staff 10 good quality leads, how many of these leads will be converted into a
sale in the next 12 to 18 months?” The challenge is that when you measure ROI
the number is often distorted because actual sales take time depending on your
sales cycle. However knowing what the success ratio is helps you put real
numbers to short term success.
Past performance
Knowing what you have accomplished in similar situations can
provide a guideline for what you can realistically expect in the future.
Lead information
technology
Another crucial bit of information is hidden in the tools
you have provided your booth staff to help them succeed. One of those tools is
some mechanism for collecting and recording consistent contact information.
This can be electronic, manual or a combination of both.
Benchmarks
Now you are ready to create benchmarks to measure the
effects of training. For example let’s
assume that at an average event your staff, over a period of two days, can
collect 20 quality leads. The improvement on this rate is the standard you use
to measure the investment in training. Your training budget now comes with an
objective that says “If everything else is equal and the only thing I will
invest in is training, then we should realize a 15%
increase in the number of leads obtained at an event.
Measuring training
In this case the 15% was an
assumed number; in your case the best way to come up with a realistic
projection is to get your staff involved in setting the expectation. Ask them
what they need and what you can expect when you provide it. Then, measure the
effects of that decision on the benchmark you have already established.
In this age of accountability for marketing and training
budgets, the need to prove that the investment actually has a payoff has never
been greater. The trick is to get into the habit of collecting data on your
performance and then do something with it.
|